01
Map the data landscape
Information types, storage locations, responsibilities and regulatory requirements are captured in a structured way.
Data · Purview · DLP · eDiscovery
In brief
Information Protection, DLP and eDiscovery for verifiable protection of sensitive business data.
Purview · DLP · eDiscovery · Updated
Typical starting point
Sensitive data is spread across Teams, SharePoint, Exchange and endpoints
Protection rules are created in isolation and generate unnecessary alerts
Retention, deletion and investigations are not documented consistently
Approach
01
Information types, storage locations, responsibilities and regulatory requirements are captured in a structured way.
02
Classification, sensitivity labels and DLP rules are designed to be understandable and practical.
03
Exceptions, incidents, eDiscovery and regular reviews receive clear processes and owners.
Examples from practice
Starting point
Contract and HR data is shared across different teams and locations.
Result
A consistent labelling and permission model protects content regardless of where it is stored.
Starting point
Sensitive information can leave the organisation unnoticed by email or via endpoints.
Result
Graduated DLP rules warn, justify or block – matched to the actual risk.
Case study
Services company in the healthcare sector, approx. 250 employees – anonymised, as all Sovratis client relationships are treated confidentially.
Starting point
Contract and HR data was spread across Teams, SharePoint and mailboxes. Nobody could say with confidence which sensitive documents existed where and who could access them – a growing risk in audits and customer enquiries.
Measures implemented
Result
Sensitive content is consistently labelled and protected, regardless of where it is stored. DLP alerts are limited to genuinely relevant cases, and customer enquiries about data protection can be answered reliably.
Outcome
Transparency over sensitive information
Traceable protection and retention rules
Fewer false alerts thanks to targeted policies
Questions & answers
Microsoft Purview combines capabilities for data classification, information protection, data loss prevention, retention, insider risk and eDiscovery.
No. Automatic detection and recommended labels can help. What matters is an understandable model with clear responsibilities.
Rules are first observed, limited to relevant data types and usage scenarios, and aligned with pilot groups.
Purview can support technical controls and evidence. It does not replace legal assessment or organisational responsibility.
Related solutions
Your situation